Work Related Trip -Oak Ridge
Greetings:
A work related trip is bringing me to the Oak Ridge area for a little less than a week coming up at the end of the month. I'll be in training most of the early part of the day and free in the afternoon. Was looking for a possible dining partner during my stay. Someone open to a few drinks and normal conversation. I would be open to a local bar/pub, playing pool/darts, seeing a movie, ect. I'm a blue collar worker, caucasian, average height and weight, in shape, mid 30's with a photo to share. No expectations here, I'm not looking for hookup, just some company to break up my stay. Looks, height, race, nationality, not important.
are u what im lookn 4?!
looking for... A black or white male. Sexy, smart, caring. knows how ta treat a gurl. shows her attention. know how to put it down. Hung. drinks or smokes or does both. (i smoke and drink). im tired of dealin with fake men. If your a real man beautiful couple want flirt hot wet pussy hit me up.
beautiful guy seeks adventuresome friend
Newly single and looking to meet a cool, kinky chick. Let's trade emails, maybe chat, and see where it goes. Ultimately looking for long-term, trustworthy partner so we can explore some fantasies together. Me: white, 6', slim, fit, well-educated, sane, creative, very handsome.
Having trouble want a mature man. black or Boston bbw tomorrow.
Pro-Prop 8 lawyers say decision should be overturned By The Associated Press 9:00am EDT (San -) Rumors swirled that the federal judge who had struck down California’s same-sex marriage ban last was, but the lawyers charged with defending the measure remained silent on the subject. Their preferred strategy for getting the ruling overturned on appeal was to focus on the law, not a judge’s personal life, they said. Eight months later, Proposition 8’s proponents and their attorneys have taken a new position. They filed a motion Monday seeking to vacate Chief. District Judge Walker’s historic ruling, a move they said was prompted by the now-retired jurist’s recent disclosure that he is in a term relationship with another. Lawyers for the ban’s backers argue that the judge’s relationship status, not his sexual orientation, gave him too much in common with the couples who successfully sued to overturn the ban in his court. The judge should have recused himself or at least revealed the relationship to avoid a real or perceived conflict of interest, the lawyers say. “If at any time while this case was pending before him, Chief Judge and his partner determined that they desired, or might, to, Chief Judge plainly had an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding,” wrote attorneys for the coalition of religious and conservative groups that put Proposition 8 on the November ballot. They are now asking the judge who inherited the case when retired at the end of February to toss out Walker’s decision. The 9th. Circuit Court of Appeals already is reviewing its legal merits at the request of the voter-approved measure’s sponsors. has said that he did not consider his sexual orientation to be any more a reason for recusal than another judge’s race or gender normally would be. A spokeswoman said Monday that the judge wouldn’t comment on the motion. FULL STORY: